Conventions are defined based on what message the author is trying to portray. Based on the different audiences and purposes the formatting will be different so that the author can portray his or her message. Often for academic writing it will be double spaced while a piece of business writing will be single spaced. The margins should also be between an inch and an inch and a half around the whole paper. Spacing the margins this way create a frame for the text.
The purpose of all of these quick reference guides is to explain a topic to a normal person who isn't an expert on the topic. A normal person who isn't an expert is the audience. They all have similar audiences because their purpose is to inform the average person and it is meant to be a quick reference guide. Quick implies that it will be simplified and easy to read through quickly which would appeal to the average person. The average person doesn't want to and might not be able to read through a high level scientific journal. They might not understand it and it isn't meant for them. Those journals are meant for people in the scientific community who already have background knowledge on the topic.
https://pixabay.com/p-48433/?no_redirect |
A common part of a quick reference guide is images are frequently used. The images include pictures, charts, graphs, diagrams, and more images. These are very important because they are used to help explain the topics that the quick reference guide is about. Visuals can offer simple explanations instead of large pieces of complicated text. This also makes it so that they are quicker to read. There is less large blocks of text.
https://docs.google.com/a/email.arizona.edu/document/d/1Mx9l5vjolhZI0bHZOpl-25VQA0sz8AnZaTLGKMIoq1M/edit?usp=sharing
Your blog had many similar conventions to mine, and I like that you included a picture right above your paragraph about images being inserted into QRGs. The analysis you have so far is very good but it could be a bit more thorough. Make sure you connect everything to why it is important to the genre.
ReplyDeleteThis analysis was very well written! I never thought about how the authors of QRG's design the heading but now that you've pointed it out, it seems very clear to me! It was interesting to read what you wrote about the pictures used in these guides. Along with the pictures you described, I think they use humor in many pictures as well! Great analysis!
ReplyDelete